Conception of capitalist rationality: conflict of interpretation

Е. И. Наумова

Abstract


The article is about the conflict of interpretation of the conception of capitalist rationality in the frame of Post-Sombart’s debates. Contemporary theorists in the accounting history propose different conflict interpretation of Sombart’s theory. These interpretations let to elaborate new approach to the problem of the development of capitalist rationality and capitalism as a whole. It is maintained that the moral rhetoric based on the principle of justification in connection with practices of accounting is the origin of capitalist rationality. The principle of justification of dealing based on calculation functions as the moral argument justified man’s inclusion in the capitalist relationship. Capitalism is thinking not only as economical system but also as a discourse based on the rhetorical practices. These practices are the moral arguments legitimized business and entrepreneurial relations in everyday life.

Keywords


conflict; interpretation; rationality; capitalism; rhetoric; morality; discourse; Sombart; Marx; Chiapello; history of accounting

References


Болтански Л., Кьяпелло Э. Новый дух капитализма. М.: НЛО, 2011.

Жижек С. Что такое китаизация? 2015 // http://theoryandpractice.ru/posts/10779-sinicisation (дата обращения: 14.10.2015).

Наумова Е. И. Культур-философское обоснование развития понятия «капитализм» // Вестник Волгоград. ун-та. Сер. 7: Философия. Социология и социальные технологии. 2014. № 5. С. 29–33.

Oчиц Ч., Буквич Р. Финансиализация и современные экономические кризисы // Вестник НГИЭИ. 2013. № 3 (22). С. 3–17.

Эрс Ж. Рождение капитализма в Средние Века. Менялы, ростовщики и крупные финансисты. СПб.: Евразия, 2014.

Carruthers B. G., Espeland W. N. Accounting for rationality: double-entry bookkeeping and the rhetoric of economic rationality // American Journal of Sociology. 1991, 97(1). P. 31–69.

Chiapello Е. Accounting and the birth of the notion of capitalism //

Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 2007, 18. P. 263–296.

Hilger M. E. Kapital, Kapitalist, Kapitalismus // Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historishes Lexicon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland [Capital, Capitalist, Capitalism, Historical Basic Concepts: Historical Lexicon in Political and Social Language in Germany]. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1982. III: 400. Р. 399–454.

Infante D. The hipsters is dead, and you might not like who comes next. 2015 // http://mashable.com/2015/06/09/post-hipster-yuccie/ (дата обращения: 14.10.2015).

Lemarchand Y. Double-entry versus charge and discharge accounting

in eighteenth-century France. Accounting // Business and Financial History. 1994, 4 (1). P. 119–145.

Stehr N., Grundmann R. Introduction // Sombert W. Economic life in the modernage / ed. by N. Sterh, R. Grundmann. New Brunswick; London: Transaction Publishers, 2001.

Yamey В. The historical significance of double-entry bookkeeping: some non-sombartian claims // Accounting Business and Financial History. 2005, 15(1). P. 77–88.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.