Г. С. Широкалова, П. И. Куконков, З. Х. Саралиева


This article analyzes the results of sociological research on the processes of students both opinions in the field of social ecology, held in 2017 g. Indicators of well-being/ill-being in this area have been selected by students of industrial and social factors harmful to nature, human relations, individual, including in the territory of residence of respondents. Students critically assess how the environmental situation, and the effectiveness of various measures for environmental protection Wednesday and role of modern public environmental organizations in implementation of environmental policies. For example, a number of normative acts of the Government, adopted in Russia, it is proved that environmental issues are often hostage to the economic interests of capital. Numerous examples of the alienation of power from people a meaningful factor in the formation of social anomie, which manifests itself, inter alia, in disregard of environmental culture even in the domestic sphere. Only 11.8% of students believe that Russians «carefully» refer to nature, 59.3% — «carelessly», 26.6% — «does not include», in other words, indifferent. The authors conclude that youth, aware of the causes and consequences of non-compliance with environmental standards, most remained passive in the protec¬tion of the rights to your own secure Wednesday. Dominated by a pessimistic forecast of development of situation in the future. As a result of conflicting social ecology field becomes a factor of ecological catastrophes in the broadest sense.


ecology; social ecology; conflict; students


  • There are currently no refbacks.