Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access


N. D. Sorokina


The article is devoted to the analysis of some, including new, approaches to the study and settlement of conflicts. There are considered the following approaches: the pragmatic turn; the concept of agonistic pluralism; system analysis. The representatives of the pragmatic turn put forward the concept of «cities» as a means of settling conflicts and a mechanism for reaching compliance. The author believes, that it is not possible to resolve this kind of conflicts in the paradigm of a pragmatic turn, at least in the short term. The concept of agonistic pluralism offers its own way of resolving and settling conflicts. For this, antagonism with its insoluble contradictions is necessary to turn agonism. This transformation will mean treating the enemy not as an enemy, but as an opponent. Thus, it is possible to achieve a conflictual consensus. However, in reality, such a transformation is difficult to achieve because social contradictions are exacerbated. The systemic approach allows us to study conflicts from the perspective of improving or worsening the existing social order. The settlement of conflicts is possible in the Russian society. But it is necessary to achieve the consent of different political forces. The fundamental principles of the existence of the Russian state and society are the basis of this consent. The author calls the information war as external obstacles to achieving consensus, to which Russia is drawn; as internal — a strong social stratification, the social policy of the state, the lack of dialogue between different political forces.


conflicts; approaches to the study of conflicts; conflict resolution; conflictual consensus; achieving of social consent


Boltanski L., Teveno L. Kritika i obosnovanie spravedlivosti. Ocherki sociologii gradov. Moskva, 2013. [Boltanski L., Theveno L. Criticism and justification of justice. Essays on the Sociology of Cities. Moscow, 2013.] (In Russ.)

Boltanski L., Thévenot L. De la justification: Les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard, 1991. (In French)

Boltanski L. Thévenot L. On justification: The economies of worth. Cambridge: Polity, 2006.

Boltanski L., Thévenot L. The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory. 1999. No. 2 (3): 359–378.

Naumova E. I. Problema konflikta v pragmaticheskoj sociologii. Konfliktologiya. 2014. № 1: 32–44. [Naumova E. I. The problem of conflict in pragmatic sociology. Konflictologia. 2014. No. 1: 32–44.] (In Russ.)

Yudin G. Lyuk Boltanski, Loran Teveno. Kritika i obosnovanie spravedlivosti: Ocherki sociologii gradov. Moskva: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2013. S. 126–129. [Yudin G. Luc Boltanski, Laurent Theveno. Criticism and justification of justice: Essays on the sociology of hailstones. Moscow, 2013: 126–129.] (In Russ.)

Hantington S. Stolknovenie civilizacij. Moskva, 2003. [Huntington S. The clash of civilizations. Moscow, 2003.] (In Russ.)

Yаnickij O. N. Chetvertaya nauchno-tekhnicheskaya revolyuciya i glubinnye izmeneniya processov globalizacii. Vestnik Instituta sociologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2017. T. 8. № 2 (21): 13–34. [Yanitsky O. N. The Fourth Scientific and Technical Revolution and Deep Changes in the Processes of Globalization. Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 2 (21): 13–34.] (In Russ.)

Bikbov A. Kapitalizm in the cite. Pushkin. 2011. № 1: 48–51. [Bikbov A. Capitalism in the cite. Pushkin. 2011. No. 1: 48–51.] (In Russ.)

Muff Sh. Drugoj mir vozmozhen. Artikulirovannye otnosheniya vlasti SH. Muff o demokratii i «konfliktnom konsensuse». [Muff Ch. Another world is possible. Articulated relations of power Sh. Muff about democracy and «conflict consensus”.] URL: (01.11.2012). (In Russ.)

Mouffe Ch. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso, 2000.

Mouffe Ch. The Return of the Political. London, 1993.

Muff Sh. K agonisticheskoj modeli demokratii. Logos. 2004. № 2 (42): 180–197. [Muff Ch. To the agonistic model of democracy. Logos. 2004. № 2 (42): 180–197.] (In Russ.)

Savin N. Poryvaya s Karlom Shmittom: ponyatie politicheskogo v teorii agonisticheskogo plyuralizma. Logos. 2015. T. 25. № 6: 163–179. [Savin N. Break with Karl Schmitt: the concept of political in the theory of agonistic pluralism. Logos. 2015. Vol. 25. No. 6: 163–179.] (In Russ.)

Alejnikov A. V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: konceptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya 1. [Aleynikov A. V. Systemic conflicts in Russia: conceptual bases of analysis. Article 1.] URL: http://e-notabene. ru/pr/article_2306.html (27.07.2017). (In Russ.)



  • There are currently no refbacks.