Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Man and the Museum: Conflict of Interest

E. G. Sokolov

Abstract


Article is devoted to studying of the conflict which with always exists between museum practice and existential needs of the person. The universal museum activity which extended for the last hundred fifty years is not such positive as it is considered to be. The tendency of a total museumfication of artifacts in museum space, which can be observed today everywhere substantially is obvious sign of trouble new European cultural models. E. Fromm, one of late representatives of psychoanalysis investigating manifestations of negative tendencies in modern reality specifies among other abnormal and destructive symptoms and a necrophilia, and also describes its characteristic signs. Many from aspects of life of the modern person and the practice, which got general support, for example, technologization, aspiration to sterility and purity, a photo boom, etc. — are signs of necrofile anthropological installations. In the museum this is fully implemented “the program of a necrophilia”. It is admissible to claim that this institution contains the conflict: between an obvious necrofile tendency of preservation and mummification of objects and vital intensions of the person. Also the fact that by means of the museum there is a total control of reality in general, and human in particular is important. Through a name, a rubrication, the systems of a signification, practice of division and formation of legitimate groups of objects, investment with sense and history the system of statements is formed. It that also defines life contours and also controls it. This control is exercised by means of discourses, which act as primary instance judging and regulating reality in relation to which the person and human life — are secondary and rigidly limited in the actions and acts.

Keywords


person; existential requirements; sadism; necrophilia; discourse of the power; total control; approval of reality

References


Фромм Э. Анатомия человеческой деструктивности. М., 2007.

Fromm, E. The Anatomy of human destructiveness. Moscow, 2007. (In Russ.)

Hentig, H. Remarks on the Interaction of Perpetrator and Victim, in The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1941, Vol. 31: 303–309.

Hentig, H. The Criminal and His Victim (Studies in the Sociobiology of Crime). New York, 1948.

Щербакова Е. Людские потери в вооруженных конфликтах в мире: 1946–2015 гг. // Демографическое обозрение. 2016. Т. 3, № 2.

Shcherbakova, E. Human losses in armed conflicts in the world: 1946–2015, in Demograficheskoe obozrenie [Demographic review], 2016, Vol. 3, No. 2. (In Russ.)

Коленько С.Г. Музей как хозяйствующий субъект территории и агент ее возрождения // Studia Culturae. Вып. 21. СПб., 2014.

Kolenko, S.G. Museum as an economic entity of the territory and the agent of its revival, Studia Culturae, Is. 21. St. Petersburg, 2014. (In Russ.)

Фуко М. Археология знания. СПб., 2004.

Foucault, M. Archaeology of knowledge. St. Petersburg, 2004. (In Russ.)

Гумилев Л.Н. Этногенез и биосфера земли. СПб., 2001.

Gumilev, L.N. Ethnogenesis and the earth's biosphere. St. Petersburg, 2001. (In Russ.)

Кожев А. Гегель, Маркс и христианство // Вопросы философии. 10, 2010.

Kozhev, A. Hegel, Marx and Christianity, in Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], 10, 2010. (In Russ.)]




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31312/2310-6085-2018-13-3-123-149

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.