THE PROBLEM OF THE GENERAL CONCEPTUAL SCHEME OF CONFLICT DESCRIPTION

А. А. Львов, К. В. Крюкова

Abstract


n the circumstances of victorious liberalism, represented by the system of welfare state, we constantly see the attempts of self-identification of various groups, communities and even peoples through the situation of conflict. An illustrious example to that is the strategy of “special path” (Sonderweg), which was very typical for different states in different time, and now is still an important instrument of the inner self-identification. However, such a strategy should be realized within both historical and anthropological perspectives: it is its only way to acquire its concrete sense and quit being a mythologem. To achieve this the paper analyzes the self-identification of the parts in the conflict as in the case of such a phenomenon as “the spirit of 1914” — the history of realization such an identification by the German intellectuals in the beginning of 20 century provides us with an important comprehensive material. It is telling that the intellectuals were gravitating from the ideas of Deutscher Sonderweg to understanding of the inner potentials of German culture and society to Pan-European openness and prolific and fruitful dialogue of equal cultures thought the whole course of the previous century. Thus, today the dialogue of cultures appears to be much more efficient and productive way of mutual recognition of the peoples and states, than self-identification through the conflict. Herewith the idea of the inner, organic union of a nation does not disappear; on the contrary, it should be acknowledged as the main power in the process of substantiality of the parts of such a dialogue as the crucial term for its meaningfulness. In this regard, Russian state and Russian society have a considerable potential, as the Russian culture was initially oriented to universal openness and outgoingness, digestion of the highest achievements of various countries and nations while preserving its original self.


Keywords


Sonderweg; national identity; cultural identity; self-identification; dialogue of cultures; anthropology of conflict

References


Кимлика У. Современная политическая философия: введение. М.: Изд. дом Гос. ун-та — Высшей школы экономики, 2010.

Кymlicka, W. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Intorduction, Higher School of Economics University Publ., Moscow, 2010. (In Russ.)

Блэкборн Д., Эли Дж. Предисловие к книге «Особенности немецкой истории: буржуазное общество и политика в Германии XIX века» // «Особый путь»: от идеологии к методу. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2018.

Blackbourn, D., Eley, G. “A Foreword to ‘The Peculiarities of German History’”, “Special Path”: From Ideology to Method, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, Moscow, 2018. (In Russ.)

Руткевич А.М. Прусский социализм и консервативная революция // Шпенглер О. Пруссачество и социализм. М.: Праксис, 2002.

Rutkenitch, A.M. “Prussian Socialism and Conservative Revolution”, Spengler, O. Prussiandom and Socialism, Praksis, Moscow, 2002. (In Russ.)

Целищев А.О. Вернер Зомбарт: образ Англии как антитеза немецкой сущности в Первой мировой войне // Imagines Mundi: Альманах исследований всеобщей истории XVI–XX вв. 2008. Т. 6. № 3: 251–261.

Tselishchev, A.O. “Werner Sombart: an. Image of England as an Antithesis to the German Essens in the World War I”, Imagines Mundi: Al’manakh issledovanii vseobshchei istorii XVI–XX vv., 2008, Vol. 6, no. 3: 251–261 (In Russ.)

Попов В.Ю., Попова О.В. Weltkriegsphilosophie i фiлософська антропологiя Макса Шелера // Антропологічні виміри філософських досліджень, 2018, Вип. 13: 142–155.

Popov, V.Yu., Popova, O.V. “Weltkriegsphilosophie and Philosophical anthropology of Max Scheler”, Antropologichni vymiri filocofs’kikh doslidzhen’, 2018, Vol. 13: 142–155. (In Ukrain.)

Солонин Ю.Н. Чемберлен — предтеча трагических мифов ХХ века // Чемберлен Х. С. Основания девятнадцатого столетия: в 2 т. Т. 1. СПб.: Русский миръ, 2012.

Solonin, Yu.N. “Chamberlain — the Forerunner of Tragical Myths of XX century”, Chamberlain, H.S. The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century. In 2 vol, Vol. 1, Russkiy Mir, St. Petersburg, 2012. (In Russ.)

Scheler, M. Der Genius des Krieges und der Deutsche Krieg, Verlag der weißen Bücher, Leipzig, 1917. (In Germ.)

Staude, J.R. Max Scheler. An Intellectual Biography, Collier-Macmillan Press, London, 1967.

Юнгер Ф. Совершенство техники. Машина и собственность. СПб.: Владимир Даль, 2002.

Jünger, F. The Perfection of Technics. Machine and Property, Vladimir Dal’, St. Petersburg, 2002. (In Russ.)

Зомбарт В. Буржуа. Евреи и хозяйственная жизнь. М.: Айрис-Пресс, 2004.

Sombart, W. The Bourgeois. The Jews and Modern Capitalism, Airis-Press, Moscow, 2004. (In Russ.)

Ясперс К. Духовная ситуация времени. М.: АСТ, 2013.

Jaspers, K. The Spiritual Situation of the Age, AST, Moscow, 2013. (In Russ.)

Schneck, S.F. Person and Polis. Scheler’s Personalism as Political Theory, State University of New Your Press, New York, 1989.

Kelly, E. Material Ethics of Value: Max Scheler and Nicolai Hartmann, Springer, 2011.

Женин И.А. Понятие «народ» в концепциях «консервативной революции» // Вестник РГГУ. Серия: История. Филология. Культурология. Востоковедение. 2010. № 18 (61): 175–186.

Zhenin, I.A. “The Term “People” in the Conceptions of ‘Conservative Revolution’”, Vestnik RGGU. Seria: Istoriya. Filologiya. Kul’turologiya. Vostokovedenie. 2010. Vol. 18 (61): 175–186. (In Russ.)

Пленков О.Ю. Триумф мифа над разумом. СПб.: Издательство «Владимир Даль», 2011.

Plenkov, O.Yu. The Triumph of Myth over Reason, Vladimir Dal’, St. Petersburg, 2011. (In Russ.)

Underhill, J.W. Humboldt, Worldview and Language, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2009.

Foerster, Fr.W. “Mr. Morel und die Schuldfrage”, Die Friedens-Warte, 1920, Vol. 22, No. 1: 4–6. (In Germ.)

Власова О.А. Карл Ясперс: Путь философа. СПб.: Владимир Даль, 2018.

Vlasova, O.A. Karl Jaspers: The Way of the Philosopher, Vladimir Dal’, St. Petersburg, 2018. (In Russ.)

Рулинский В.В. «Проблема вины» в контексте преодоления тоталитаризма: о пользе немецкого опыта // Труды по Россиеведению. 2014. № 5: 186–208.

Rulinsky, V.V. “ ‘The Problem of Giult’ in the Context of the Overcoming of Totalitarianism: On the Use of German Experience”, Trudy po Rossievedeniyu, 2014, Vol. 5: 186–208. (In Russ.)

Арендт Х. Опыты понимания, 1930–1954. Становление, изгнание и тоталитаризм. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара, 2018.

Arendt, H. Essays in Understanding, 1930—1954. Formation, Exile and Totalitarianism, Publ. Institut Gaidara, Moscow, 2018. (In Russ.)

MacGregor, N. Germany. Memories of a Nation, UK, Penguin Books, 2016.

Львов А.А. Позитивные основания аксиологического аспекта историко-философских исследований // Философские науки. 2019. Т. 62. № 10: 55–67.

Lvov, A.A. “The Positive Foundations of the Axiological Aspect of Historical-Philosophical Research”, Folosofskie Nauki, 2019, Vol. 62, no. 10: 55–67. (In Russ.)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31312/2310-6085-2020-15-2-38-53

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.