A. V. Aleinikov, G. G. Gazimagomedov, A. I. Strebkov


This article analyzes the impact of ethno-religious conflict on national security in the context of the radicalization of their ideological component. The nature of ethnoreligious conflicts lies in the unequal position in the system of social coordinates, but at the same time relatively unfree development and restriction of the interest arising from social conditions of life, which receives final social life and satisfaction as a result of its political legitimation, manifested in the form of state support. Every ethnoreligious conflict is a symptom of both the lack of equality and freedom, manifested primarily in ideological radicalization, striving for fundamentalism, extreme forms of conscious and unconscious aggression, reduced from an ideological state to extremist actions, which creates a real danger and threat to social and national security. The growth of ideological tension and subsequent conflict actions reaches the limits beyond which the existing security system either actualizes its protective functions, or seeks to change the degrees of equality and freedom of actualized interest. While in the first case, the state, in an effort to maintain the security system at the same level, uses coercive legal instruments, which manifest themselves in other forms of coercion than before, in the second case, both the normative and social coordinates of the realization of ethnic and religious interest, and then in the second case, both the normative and social coordinates of the realization of ethnic and religious interest and at the same time of the entire existing security system are subject to revision. Understanding by the state of the indisputable fact that in the modern world security is relative to social interests, it allows it to react sensitively to the growth of ethnic and religious tension, to protect these movements from ideological radicalization and ethnic religious extremism.


equality; freedom; security; national security; danger; threats; conflict; ethnoreligious conflict


Бакунин М.А. Федерализм, социализм и антитеологизм. Мотивированное предложение Центральному комитету Лиги Мира и Свободы от М. Бакунина // Бакунин М.А. Философия. Социология. Политика. М.: Правда, 1989. С. 89.

Bakunin, M.A., Federalism, socialism and antitheologism. Motivated proposal to the Central Committee of the League of Peace and Freedom from M. Bakunin, in Bakunin, M.A., Philosophy. Sociology. Politics, Pravda Publ., Moscow, 1989, p. 89. (In Russ.)

Флеровский Н. Положение рабочего класса в России. Наблюдения и исследования. С.-Петербург: Издание Н.П. Полякова, 1869. С. 15.

Flerovsky, N., The position of the working class in Russia. Observations and research, Edition N.P. Polyakova, St. Petersburg. 1869, p. 15. (In Russ.)

Ионин Л.Г. Восстание меньшинств. М.; СПб.: Университетская книга, 2012. С. 199.

Ionin, L.G., Minority uprising, University Book, Moscow, St. Petersburg, 2012, p. 199. (In Russ.)

Энгельс Ф. Введение к работе К. Маркса «Классовая борьба во Франции с 1848 по 1850 г.». // К. Маркс и Ф. Энгельс Соч. Изд. второе. М.: Гос. издат. полит. литературы. 1962. С. 530.

Engels, F. Introduction to the work of K. Marx “The class struggle in France from 1848 to 1850”, in Marx, K., Engels, F. Op. 2nd ed., State. publishing watered literature, Moscow, 1962, p. 530. (In Russ.)

Кротов Д.В. Политическая безопасность России (на материалах Южного Федерального округа) // Собрание трудов «Южнороссийское обозрение». 2003. Вып. 14.

Krotov, D.V., Political Security of Russia (on the materials of the Southern Federal District), in Collected Works “South Russian Review”, 2003, Release 14. (In Russ.)

Концепция общественной безопасности в Российской Федерации. Утверждена Президентом РФ от 20.11.2013 г. [The concept of public safety in the Russian Federation. Approved by the President of the Russian Federation on 11/20/2013] // URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/19653 (In Russ.)

Маркс К. Передовица в № 179 «Kolnische Zeitung» // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч. 2-e изд. Т. 1. М.: Гос. издат. полит. литературы, 1954. С. 108.

Marx, K. Editorial in No. 179 “Kolnische Zeitung”, in Marx, K., Engels, F., Op. 2nd ed., Vol. 1, State. publishing watered literature, Moscow, 1954, p. 108. (In Russ.)

Завершинский К.Ф. Легитимность: генезис, становление и развитие концепта// Полис. Политические исследования. 2001.№ 2, С.113-131.

Zavershinsky, K.F. Legitimacy: the genesis, the formation and development of the concept, in Policy. Political studies, 2001, No. 2: 113–131. (In Russ.)

Конфликт в Екатеринбурге: зеркало системных проблем [The conflict in Yekaterinburg: a mirror of system problems] // Политком.RU. Информационный сайт политических комментариев. [Politkom.RU. Information site political commentary]. URL: http://politcom.ru/23407.html (In Russ.)

Религия и конфликт / под. ред. А. Малашенко и С. Филатова; Моск. Центр Карнеги. М.: Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН), 2007. С. 8.

Malashenko, A., Filatova, S. (eds.), Religion and conflict, Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN), Moscow, 2007, p. 8. (In Russ.)

Сергиев Посад может превратиться в православный Ватикан за 140 млрд рублей [Sergiev Posad can turn into an Orthodox Vatican for 140 billion rubles]. URL: https://news.mail.ru/economics/37776894/?frommail=1 (In Russ.)

Делевский Ю. Социальные антагонизмы и классовая борьба в истории. Петербург, Типогр. т-ва «Общественная польза», 1910. С. 11.

Delevsky, Y. Social antagonisms and class struggle in history, Tipografiya “Public benefit”, Petersburg, 1910, p. 11. (In Russ.)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31312/2310-6085-2019-14-2-21-40


  • There are currently no refbacks.