THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE TWO WORLDS IS NOT OVER

С. А. Денисов

Abstract


Russian conflictology has put forward the paradigm of the main contradiction of the modern world, which can turn into the main conflict of modernity, which determines the development of this world. According to the author, such a conflict today remains the struggle between the bourgeois and administrative socio-economic system. The article describes the model of administrative society and the state. This struggle began with the era of bourgeois revolutions. It reached its highest level in the twentieth century and took the form of a conflict between the camp of «socialism» and the camp of capitalism. Today, it is going through another historical stage. The article describes the parties to the conflict at its current stage. The administrative world is represented by the leaders of the countries and the ruling group. The bourgeois world is represented by politicians elected by society, who are dependent on the active part of the population. The struggle between the two socio-economic systems takes place in all spheres of public life. In economics, the bourgeoisie seeks to transform the world into a single market with the protection of private property, entrepreneurship. The administrative class seeks to maintain the state's dominance over the economy. In the social sphere, the bourgeoisie is trying to turn the administrative class into an obedient layer of bureaucracy. It seeks to impose on the whole world democratic standards of life and a republic with its domination of elected public politicians over the bureaucracy. The freedom of information movement allows the bourgeoisie to spread its views around the world and undermines the authority of the ruling groups of the administrative world. This conflict is not only international in nature. It manifests itself in the struggle between the administrative and the bourgeois class within each country. The main conflict of modernity does not eliminate conflicts between other groups and for other reasons, but significantly affects their character. This conflict is antagonistic in nature. In the twentieth century, the administrative system tried to destroy the bourgeois one. Today, the bourgeoisie has taken the offensive. The struggle between the two socio-economic systems is covered by the «fanning» of interreligious, intercultural and interethnic conflicts.

Keywords


the main contradiction of modernity; the struggle of two worlds; the history of the conflict; the parties to the conflict; the spheres of the conflict

References


Ленинская теория социалистической революции и современность. М.: Политическая литература, 1972.

Lenin's Theory of the Socialist Revolution and Modernity, Moscow, Politicheskay literatura, 1972. (In Russ.)

Денисов С.А. Административное общество. Екатеринбург: Гуманитарный университет, 2011.

Denisov, S.A., Administrative society, Ekaterinburg, Humanitarian University, 2011. (In Russ.)

Денисов С.А. Общая теория административного государства. Екатеринбург: Гуманитарный университет, 2010.

Denisov, S.A., General theory of the administrative State, Ekaterinburg, Humanitarian University, 2010. (In Russ.)

Фукуяма Ф. Конец истории и последний человек. М.: АСТ, Ермак, 2005.

Fukuyama, F., The end of the story and the last man, Moscow, AST, Ermak, 2005. (In Russ.)

Шкаратан О.И. К сравнительному анализу влияния цивилизационных различий на социальные процессы в посткоммунистическом мире // СОЦИС. 2007, № 10.

Shkaratan, O.I. “Comparative analysis of the impact of civilizational differences on social processes in the post-communist world”, SOCIS, 2007, no. 10. (In Russ.)

Кашин В. Что не так с расхожим пониманием внешнеполитического опыта Китая // Профиль. 2021, 30 марта.

Kashin, V. “What is wrong with the common understanding of China's foreign policy experience”, Profil, 2021, 30 March. (In Russ.)

Маслов А. Китай смотрит на мир XXII века и даже XXIII [Maslov, A., China looks at the world of the XXII century and even the XXIII], URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/comments/kitay-smotrit-na-mir-xxii-veka-i-dazhe-xxiii/?sphrase_id=77795728 (09.05.2021). (In Russ.)

Школяр Н. Внешняя торговля России: ситуация перед новой стратегией [Shkolar, H., Foreign trade of Russia: the situation before the new strategy], URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/vneshnyaya-torgovlya-rossii-situatsiya-pered-novoy-strategiey/?sphrase_id=77681435 (08.05.2021). (In Russ.)

Vines, A. “China in Africa: A Mixed Blessing?”, Current History, Philadelphia, May 2007, Vol. 106, Iss. 700: 213–219.

Денисов С.А. Реставрация административной социальной системы в России // Россия и современный мир. 2005. № 4: 106–116.

Denisov, S.A. “Restoration of the administrative social system in Russia”, Russia and the modern world, 2005, no. 4: 106–116. (In Russ.)

Российско-китайское сотрудничество в Африке: доклад Российского совета по международным делам (РСМД), Института международных и стратегических исследований Пекинского ун-та, доклад № 66/2021. М.: НП РСМД, 2021.

Russian-Chinese Cooperation in Africa: report of the Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC), Institute of International and Strategic Studies, Beijing University, Report, no. 66/2021, Moscow, NP RIAC, 2021. (In Russ.)

Политика санкций: цели, стратегии, инструменты: хрестоматия. М.: НП РСМД, 2020.

The policy of sanctions: goals, strategies, tools: a textbook, Moscow, NP RIAC, 2020. (In Russ.)

Муллахметова Д. Политика иранского правительства по урегулированию киберпространства [Mullahmetova, D. The Iranian government's policy on regulating cyberspace], URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/columns/sandbox/politika-iranskogo-pravitelstva-po-uregulirovaniyu-kiberprostranstva/ (08.05.2021). (In Russ.)

Савельева Л. О психологии ядерных амбиций Ирана [Savelieva, L. On the psychology of Iran's nuclear ambitions], URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/blogs/savelyeva-larisa/o-psikhologii-yadernykh-ambitsiy-irana/?sphrase_id=77644519 (08.05.2021). (In Russ.)

Rowen, H.S. “When will the chinese people be free?”, Journal of Democracy, 2007, Vol. 18, Iss. 3: 38–50.

Gottfried, P.E. After Liberalism. Mass Democracy in the Managerial state, Princeton, 1999.

Carlson, A. “The new American faith”, Modern Age, Wilmington, Spring, 2000, Vol. 42, Iss. 2: 209–213.

Лукьянов Ф. Джо Байден и его синтез [Lukianov, F., Joe Biden and his synthesis], URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/comments/dzho-bayden-i-ego-sintez/?sphrase_id=77795728 (09.05.2021). (In Russ.)

Лукьянов Ф. Диверсификация без паники [Lukianov, F. Diversify without panic], URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/comments/diversifikatsiya-bez-paniki/?sphrase_id=77795728 (09.05. 2021). (In Russ.)

Кортунов А. Как Америка хочет поссорить Россию и Китай [Kortunov, A. How America wants to put Russia and China at odds], URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/kak-amerika-khochet-possorit-rossiyu-i-kitay/?sphrase_id=77795728 (09.05.2021). (In Russ.)

Хантингтон С. Столкновение цивилизаций. М.: АСТ, 2003.

Huntington, S. Clash of Civilizations, Moscow, AST, 2003. (In Russ.)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31312/2310-6085-2021-16-2-36-53

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.